Last week we were delighted to welcome John Houghton, Clinical Research Fellow from the George Davies Research Team, to present on the subject of writing for conferences. He led a brilliant interactive session, where we got to evaluate and discuss what makes the difference in conference writing.
To summarise, here are some top tips from John:
Abstract writing
- Your title is the most important part of your abstract – make it short, sharp and attention-grabbing
- Keep the background brief. One sentence for the problem/existing knowledge/research and one for the aim of the study/audit should be enough
- Structure your methods around your PICO question (if applicable) with a sentence for each. For audit/QI projects one sentence each for setting, standard, intervention/change and outcome measure
- You should only have one primary outcome measure
- Use acronyms/abbreviations sparingly – lots of acronyms make your abstract very difficult to read
- Spend most of your words on your results section
- Reporting your statistical tests with the results can save words e.g. x was associated with y (p<.001; chi-squared test)
- Keep your conclusions short – two sentences max
- Don’t repeat your results in the conclusions
- Try to avoid talking about future research in your conclusions – if you have to, be specific about what future research should be done e.g. multi-centred randomised trials are needed to confirm these findings
Poster writing
- Design your poster to visually articulate your main messages, the less writing the better!
- Mike Morrison’s video “How to create a better research poster in less time” provides some great ideas on keeping your poster simple and maximising interaction at a conference. There are templates available in the video description, and you can also check out #betterposter on Twitter.
And finally: Don’t be afraid to submit your work to conferences – it’s very likely to be accepted!
Thank you to John for sharing your wisdom and experience in such an informative session!